Where the Banks Went Wrong – The Beginning

By Tim Holland

 

It is always interesting to hear U. S. Treasury officials, members of Congress and even candidates on the campaign trail stating precisely the cause of the financial crisis we are currently experiencing.  It’s bad mortgages, they say, or greed on Wall Street or out of control mortgage lenders or possibly Congress itself.  One thing that is certain, there is plenty of blame to go around.

 

The problem is that they are all missing the point.  Everyone’s frame of reference seems to have a beginning sometime within the past ten years, so let me give you a different view.

 

In 1976 I was responsible for the lending activities of the Los Angeles subsidiary of a major New York commercial bank.  In the midst of a credit review meeting it was learned that a local Los Angeles bank had just announced that it was going to begin to partially compensate its loan officers by paying them a commission on the loans they brought into the bank.  Everyone around the table at that credit meeting had the same reaction: disbelief.  The consensus was that loan quality would be sacrificed for the benefit of loan quantity. 

 

The bank in question defended its decision by claiming that its loan review process would be able to weed out the expected bad loans from the good ones.  Those of us who were in the business of reviewing, analyzing, approving and recommending board approvals, knew differently.  However, we also believed that no one would be dumb enough to follow such an ill-conceived concept devised by a local Los Angeles bank, especially the major banking institutions in New York, Chicago and San Francisco. So much for logic and good banking practice in the face of increased short term earnings.

 

It was about a year later that we learned that a major bank based in Illinois, which would file for bankruptcy in less than ten years, had bought into the idea of sales commissions for its staff.  It may be only coincidental but bad management takes many forms.

 

What is particularity instructive is not the specific issue of the sales commission but the shifting of emphasis from courting and rewarding the customer to that of rewarding the employee at the expense of the customer. 

 

The era of the Depression of the 1930’s has many lessons for us and I offer the following as an example that we are not in new territory but a place we have been before.  The quotation below is by Lindsay Bradford in an address to the Savings Division of the American Bankers Association meeting held in New York at the Waldorf-Astoria in 1937, as reported by “The New York Times.”

 

“The actual facts are that the problem is a simple one if we follow the logical rules of not attempting to speculate in either credit risks or future interest rates.  It is when we depart from the simple principles and by a policy of expediency endeavor to make what I choose to term ‘unnatural banking profits’ that we sometimes find ourselves in difficulties.  Those banks will best overcome the inevitable hazards of our complicated economic existence who have established principles of operation and faithfully adhere to them.”

 

More importantly, he subsequently mentioned a variation of something I had learned early on in my own financial training with regard to the duties and focus of a bank officer: the number one priority is the depositor, the customer who has placed his financial trust in you; number two is the community, which is to be the beneficiary of the credit activity of the bank; number three is the shareholder of the bank, who has staked his own funds in its success and future.  The basic concept is that if you take care of the first two the third one takes care of itself.

 

What began in 1976 was the beginning of a change in focus.  To bring in accounts, no longer is the industry going to focus on the customer: no more toasters and free dinnerware for a new account as a way of rewarding the depositor or the borrower.  The focus in the future would become internal when it came to rewards.  Rewards going forward would be for employees and management.

 

The end result becomes a reverse of what had been taught about banking and the bankers’ responsibility so that the customer suddenly ends up at the tail end of the pecking order with the bank staff being first, followed by the stockholder.  The community completely disappears from the plan because banks no longer have a sense of community, as they have gone global.

 

As mentioned at the start, this is where the problem for the banks began.  It is not the creation of the bad loan or even the creation of complex financial instruments it is the system, culture and philosophy that has come to permeate the financial sector which rewards bad and excessive behavior at the expense of its customers in the name of having the ability to generate ever increasing profits.  Coming back to haunt the banks is the old saying “Be careful what you wish for.” The banks have made case after case in favor of de-regulation so they could compete in the global marketplace, well, they’ve been successful.

 

The problems did not begin a few years ago.  Everything is tied together and when the financial history of the 20th and 21st centuries are written for the text books of the 22nd century what we are trying to fix today will be seen as the second stage of the Savings and Loan crisis and the deregulation of an industry that should never have been deregulated as it was, nor allowed to roam free in the marketplace. 

 

 

 


© 2008 Timothy Holland                                                                                    First Published:  10/06/2008

Note: 

Tim Holland is a stall writer for www.tothecenter.com , an internet news magazine.  He currently writes a weekly Op-Ed column for the magazine on a variety of topics.  Copies of previous Op-Ed columns and Essays can be found at www.tim-holland.com.  Comments are welcome and may be sent to: Admin@tim-holland.com