When Is a Bank Not a Bank
By Tim Holland
It seems to me that the headlines generated by
the executive musical chairs being played at Citigroup merely bring to the fore
the entire issue, and possibly even the raison d’etre,
of the so called financial services conglomerate. Citigroup is not really a bank any more but a
holding entity for a variety of businesses within the loosely defined financial
community.
Citigroup actually runs a
series of divergent business under its umbrella (the red one they acquired from
Travelers Insurance and refused to give back when they spun them off) which
they list as: Global Consumer, Corporate and Investment Banking, and Global
Wealth Management. But where’s the
bank? It must be in there
somewhere. Remember banks? They are the places where you deposited your
money: a) for safekeeping, b) to earn interest on your savings, c) to write
checks so you can pay your bills, d) to borrow some money when you wanted to
make a major purchase. What ever
happened to them?
We have in the way of banks,
what the U. S. Congress has, in its wisdom, given us, with the help of some
self interested major players. It is
through Congress’ de-regulation, re-regulation and general lack of
understanding of why we separated banks from other types of businesses in the
first place, that we see the approach to family finances that the current
generation of banks offer. Congress justified permitting the creation of the
financial services company by seeming to require certain protections for the
customer and then failing to recognize that an army of accountants, lawyers and
consultants would be able to find their way around any roadblock. Learning from history and understanding the
corporate world is not Congress’ strong point.
The major players in the U.
S. Banking world have bought into the idea that banks should be like department
stores: one stop shopping. A trip to
your local branch should provide a portal to every other type of financial
service a family could ever need.
The problem that has evolved
is that what someone managed to convince the banking community was logical on
paper, may not be practical. The
definition of financial services may be too broad and trying to put every
business that even remotely looks like a financial service under one umbrella
may not be the best approach.
Once upon a time, we had
financial institutions that catered to specific aspects of the individual and
corporate marketplace. What we used to
refer to as “people” banks were Savings and Loan Associations, Credit Unions
and Savings Banks. We also had
Commercial Banks, International Banks, Correspondent Banks, Merchant Banks,
Trust Companies and a whole host of other specialist institutions. Now one bank tries to be all of the above and
more. The S and L’s, of course,
disappeared after Congress relaxed the rules for them and management greed and
stupidity took over. Commercial banks
stepped into the breech, salivating all the way, assuming they would just take
over the market. They did for a while
but, as the mergers continued and nationwide banking became a reality, the
market changed when customers realized the brick and mortar of the local branch
began to look and feel more like gingerbread and the smiling people inside were
being paid commissions to fatten up customers with credit they didn’t need in
the expectation of feeding off the high interest rates used to finance
purchases they couldn’t afford to make.
The result was the opening of the door to the creation of the Community
Bank - basically the entity that was envisioned when they changed the rules for
S and L’s.
It looks like it’s time for
the financial service behemoths to start rethinking what they have become and
start evaluating not only what they want to be but also what they,
realistically, should be and more importantly - can be. The words “ back to
basics” comes to mind, assuming they still know what banking basic are. It might also be helpful if they had more
bankers running banks, rather than lawyers and accountants. Remember bankers - they’re the people who
earned their stripes by working with and servicing customers, opening accounts,
evaluating financial statements and making loans. Hopefully there are still a few of them
around.
![]()
© 2007 Timothy Holland
First
Published
Note:
This opinion/essay is the
property of the author. It is offered
for use by individuals who are also free to copy and make it available to other
individuals as they wish. Anyone wishing
to make use of the material for commercial purposes must seek permission of the
author, who can be reached at Impressions@Tim-Holland.com. Such permission will not be unreasonably
refused.